Undergraduate Education Programs

Student outcomes for undergraduate programs in Education are aligned with Michigan Standards for Teachers as well as standards from professional organizations. Student learning is assessed using a vast array of informal and formal assessments, ranging from course embedded assessments, performance during field experiences, and MTTC scores. Assessment data is used for ongoing reflection, critique, and further development of our programs. As part of the larger Education Unit, we are in the process of developing and implementing assessments consistent with NCATE accreditation.


Early Childhood Education (BS) (ZS)

Key assessments of Early Childhood Studies (BS) and Early Childhood Specialization (ZS) programs are up to date reflecting new programs, revisions in programs, changes in accreditation standards, and changes in content within courses. Streamlined seven key assessments are aligned with program objectives and students learning outcomes closely. Assessed competencies and skills include demonstration of theoretical knowledge and application of child development, effective use of communication practices, demonstration of developmentally sensitive practices, and professional dispositions. All assessment measures are practical for instructors to maintain, analyze, and implement data-informed changes in curriculum, and are implemented as assignments in courses.


elementary Education (BS)

The Elementary Education program assesses teacher candidates on their content knowledge, ability to design and deliver instruction, their ability to design and analyze assessment data, and their professional dispositions in their coursework and fieldwork. In 2017-2018 teacher candidates performed at or slightly below the state average on the Michigan Test for Teacher Certification, which measures content knowledge. Our teacher candidates performed at Proficient level in designing instruction and professionalism in the field. Our candidates performed between the Basic and Proficient levels in delivering instruction (specifically in classroom management) and analyzing assessment data.


Graduate Education Programs

Student outcomes for Graduate programs in Education, including specialization programs in Early Childhood Education, Educational Technology, Literacy Education and Special Education, re aligned with Michigan Standards for Teachers, standards from professional organizations, and ongoing review of current research and literature. Student learning is assessed and evaluated using student portfolios, course embedded assessments, performance during field experiences, and MTTC scores.  Assessment data is used for ongoing reflection, critique, and development of programs of effective programs.  As part of the larger Education Unit, we are in the process of developing and implementing assessments consistent with NCATE accreditation.


Early Childhood Education (MA)


Educational technology (MA, np)

Educational Technology MA and NP endorsement students are given a Common Assessment at four points in their program. The Common Assessment measures students’ ability to demonstrate essential skills and understanding of key principles in the field of Educational Technology. Data from this assessment suggests that a vast majority of Educational Technology MA students are meeting or exceeding expectations for skills and knowledge in their program.

Public Administration - Educational Administration (MA)

The program concentration in Educational Administration equips the aspiring educational administrator with leadership concepts, tactical strategies and an informed perspective to address school-based problems. The MPA curriculum is aligned with the State Board of Education standards, along with those of the Educational Leadership Constituent Council.

Literacy Education (MA)

UM-Flint’s Literacy Education Master’s Program utilizes a comprehensive assessment plan and was nationally recognized without conditions by NCATE/CAEP and ILA in January 2015.  NCATE/CAEP, ILA, and MDE all have stringent requirements that must be addressed and approved by either a desk audit or an on-site committee visit. In response to these requirements all course content and related course assessments must identify and effectively address state and national standards. During the 2016-2017 academic year program candidates met or those standards and had a 100% pass rate on the Michigan Department of Education State Licensure Test (MTTC Reading Specialist Exam).


Inclusive Education (MA)

During the first year of the Master of Arts in Inclusive Education program students are assessed on their content knowledge, ability to analyze program evaluation data, and professional dispositions in their coursework. In the 2017-2018 academic year students performed at proficient levels in content knowledge, ability to analyze program evaluation data, and professional dispositions.


Mathematics Education for Elementary and Early Childhood Educators (MA)

The Master of Arts in Mathematics Education for Elementary and Early Childhood Educators is currently in its pilot year, with the first cohort (n=6) of students who are working teachers beginning in Summer 2017. In this first year have focused on course development. As there are no state licensing requirements for this program we are working to prepare the teachers in our program to improve the following core set of eight high-leverage Mathematics Teaching Practices* and essential teaching skills to promote deep learning of mathematics: 

  • Establish mathematics goals to focus learning; 

  • Implement tasks that promote reasoning and problem solving; 

  • Use and connect mathematical representations; 

  • Facilitate meaningful mathematical discourse; 

  • Pose purposeful questions; 

  • Build procedural fluency from conceptual understanding; 

  • Support productive struggle in learning mathematics; 

  • Elicit and use evidence of student thinking. 

That said, our specific measurable objectives and assessment tools are:

Objective #1: Candidates will increase their mathematical knowledge for teaching which shall be measured by the Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching (MKT) assessment tool.

Objective #2: Candidates will increase their ability to analyze students’ mathematical thinking within a grade-specific content area in relation to research-based learning trajectories, and formulate effective instructional responses.  This shall be measured by the Task Analysis of Student Knowledge (TASK) assessment tool.

Objective #3: Candidates will improve their classroom teaching practice with a particular focus on improving mathematical discourse in their classrooms.  We are currently seeking a tool that will measure this.

Objective #4: Candidates will work to develop leadership skills in mathematics education, and a leadership project will be developed as part of their course work in the winter semester of the second year.  Principal and candidate surveys will be the main ways of collecting this data.

*Reference: “Principles to Actions, Ensuring Mathematical Success for All,” National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2014.


Master of Arts in Secondary Education with Certification (MAC)

Assessments in the Master of Arts in Secondary Education with Certification program are designed to align with standards set by both the Michigan Department of Education (MDE) and our prior accrediting body, the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE).  NCATE has subsequently been subsumed under a new national accrediting body known as the Council for Accreditation for Educator Preparation (CAEP). 

This professional program prepares candidates to teach secondary-level students in any content area with a particular focus on teaching in urban high schools.

Program Goal and Objectives:

The goal of the Secondary MAC program is to prepare an urban educator like no other through the following educational objectives for each teacher candidate who demonstrates the following:

  1. Awareness of unique characteristics and needs of diverse student populations;
  2. Understanding of how principles and theories of adolescent development can inform educational practice;
  3. Awareness of educational and social issues that are unique to an urban high school context;
  4. Ability to develop and implement a variety of instructional strategies that are effective in urban high school settings;
  5. Understanding of the social, cultural, psychological, and emotional components of the adolescent (i.e., “teaching to the whole child”);
  6. Ability to work collaboratively in order to enhance school/community relationships;
  7. Enhanced knowledge of how to integrate new technologies into teaching and learning;
  8. Pedagogical-content knowledge necessary to make appropriate instructional decisions; and
  9. Exposure to current research and theory in education.

Key Assessments:

While preparing for our upcoming renewal of accreditation through CAEP, we are currently following NCATE’s framework for program level assessment. The six required assessments (followed by an optional seventh assessment) are each listed followed by a brief description of the assessment we conduct to meet the requirements.

  1. Licensure assessment, or other content-based assessment

    1. The SAT serves as an assessment of basic skills, as required by the state of Michigan
    2. The Michigan Tests for Teacher Certification (MTTC) serve as content-based assessments
  2. Assessment of content knowledge

The Interdisciplinary Project (occurring in EDS 530 & EDR 548) assesses the teacher candidate’s ability to plan instruction that incorporates content from the two key disciplines of literacy and mathematics in which urban students struggle to succeed.

  1. Assessment of candidate ability to plan instruction

The Ability to Plan Instruction assessment (occurring in EDS 698) measures the teacher candidate’s ability to plan a coherent, standards-based series of lesson within an instructional unit.

  1. Assessment of student teaching/field experiences

The Student Teaching Observation is a formal assessment conducted at four points during the student teaching year by a faculty member and the coaching teacher. The observation is formative in providing performance feedback and summative in determining the teacher candidate’s successful completion of student teaching.

  1. Assessment of candidate’s effect on student (P-12) learning

The Impact on Student Achievement is a performance-based assessment measuring teacher candidate’s ability to plan instruction, teach, conduct formative and summative assessment, collect student performance data, analyze performance data, modify instruction accordingly, and further refine future teaching.

  1. Additional assessment that addresses professional standards

The Professional dispositions assessment is administered at three points in the program to measure and provide formative feedback to the teacher candidate about his/her professionalism. This performance-based assessment is conducted by faculty, the coaching teacher, and as a self-assessment by the teacher candidate.

  1. Additional assessment that addresses professional standards (optional)

The Clinical Observation and Reflective Log is a weekly assessment throughout the two years of the program measuring the teacher candidate’s observational skills and reflective practice as it relates to the candidate’s developing understanding of teaching practices and self-knowledge in developing relationships with learners to ensure effective teaching and their academic success.



Education Specialist (Ed.S)


Doctor of Education (Ed.D)



Social Work

The Social Work program assess BSW candidates the four dimensions (Knowledge, Values, Skills, Cognitive and Affective Processes) for the nine competencies listed in CSWE (Council on Social Work Education) EPAS (Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards) 2015 using two assessments, the SWEAP (Social Work Education Assessment Project) and Field Evaluations. In 2016-2017, BSW candidates performed above the national average on the SWEAP, which measures content knowledge. BSW candidates performed at Competent or Advanced level in all competencies except for Research.


The Bachelor of Science in Substance Use Treatment and Intervention is currently in the pilot year. The first cohort of students began in Fall 2017. The first year of the program has focused on student retention and course development. The program follows the 12 core functions set by the Michigan Certification Board of Addiction Professionals (MCBAP).